Wednesday, October 6, 2010 - 10:57 AM
Some of the big U.S. newspapers -- the Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post -- are unhappy with how ambassador-designates are being treated in the vetting process for posts in the oil- and geopolitics-soaked lands of Eurasia.
U.S. designees to this region are, in fact, experiencing unusual turbulence. In the midst of the turmoil that has engulfed Kyrgyzstan over the last few months, Tatiana Gfoeller will be replaced as U.S. ambassador by Pamela Spratlen, currently the deputy chief of mission in Kazakhstan. An unexplained bureaucratic snafu is preventing Douglas Hengel, a deputy assistant secretary of state, from occupying the long-vacant slot in Turkmenistan. And Frank Ricciardone's move to the embassy in Ankara is being held up in the Senate, as my colleague Josh Rogin has written.
Yet the main reason for these newspapers' angst is the ambassador's post in Azerbaijan, which has been empty for some 14 months now. Perhaps not since the kitty-cat John Bolton was nominated to the United Nations has a designee attracted at turns such adoration and venom as Matthew Bryza, the choice of the George W. Bush and now the Obama administrations for the Baku post, as Laura Rozen has reported at Politico.
In dueling editorials published in a space of three days, the Journal and Post mourn Bryza's woes, since two senators have used their prerogative to freeze his confirmation. Bryza is "respected by all sides" and should be "waved through the Senate," says the Journal. Instead, the paper says, he is being held up by "Caucasian tribal obsessions" -- meaning Armenian lobbyists.
The Post, meanwhile, is downright apoplectic. It has awarded Sen. Barbara Boxer what it calls its "Most Craven Election-Year Pandering at the Expense of the National Interest Award" for the hold that she has placed on Bryza, again because of Armenian influence in her re-election effort. (The paper has tarred Sen. Robert Menendez with the same offense, but refused him the award. Menendez replies that he is unhappy with the Post's unhappiness.) "Mr. Bryza is an unlikely target for a political fight," writes The Post:
Highly regarded by both Republicans and Democrats, he has spent the past 13 years working to advance U.S. interests in the Caucasus at the National Security Council and the State Department.
The editorial boards of these newspapers ought to catch up on their reading. As this blog has written, Bryza, while among the most likeable of people, is a "likely target for a political fight," something he himself knew going in to the nomination. The first reason is the region's very emotional nature -- fighting is what they do. But Bryza himself has a back story.
As journalists, we are admonished to report the story, not become the story. But this rule may not carry over into diplomacy, at least as conducted by Bryza. Bryza hasn't gone quietly about his business over the years, as The Post suggests, but been exceedingly high-profile. During the 2008 Russia-Georgia war, his colleagues accused him of "Blackberry diplomacy," for his practice of carrying out diplomatic business out of channel, and directly telephoning Georgia President Mikheil Saakashvili. A former Georgian minister named Giorgy Khaindrava famously shoved Bryza around the lobby of the Tbilisi Marriott, blaming him for having "propped up" Saakashvili, as Jay Solomon reported in the Journal. Photographs appeared of Bryza being greeted by Georgians on the street:
Bryza is exceptionally close not only to presidents, but to a number of journalists (for the record, I have interviewed him numerous times since 1997), to whom he delivers sometimes inflated accounts of his role as a "key architect" of the triumphant Baku-Ceyhan oil pipeline (an admittedly not-so-unique offense -- many officials claim that mantle). Bryza sought the celebrity limelight with his 2007 Istanbul wedding, which was attended by invited senior-level Azeri and Turkish guests, and was the talk of the Turkish city.
Some colleagues attribute Bryza's rise in the last administration to his connections to Condoleezza Rice, and have advised Bryza to work his way to the top like everyone else by serving first somewhere as a deputy chief of mission. Bryza may be right that his nearly two decades in the State Department are credential enough, but he -- and the newspapers -- shouldn't be surprised at the roadblock to his confirmation.
VANO SHLAMOV/AFP/Getty Images
EXPLORE:CAUCASUS, NORTH AMERICA, BUSH ADMINISTRATION, BUSH'S LEGACY, DIPLOMACY, FREEDOM, GEORGIA, HISTORY, INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, OBAMA ADMINISTRATION, OIL, POLITICS, RUSSIA, STATE DEPARTMENT, U.S. CONGRESS, U.S. FOREIGN POLICY, UNITED NATIONS
Matthew Bryza is not the saint that the Wall Street Journal and others have depicted him as.
For example, in two articles, FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds takes Bryza apart with various charges of impropriety (perhaps Steve Levine should read this too).
Go to these two links to witness the slicing and dicing of Bryza and then tell me if you still think he's fit to be ambassador:
http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/?s=bryza
http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2010/07/27/obama-appoints-a-not-too-long-ago-hatched-neocon-larva/
Talking about charges, what do you think about Senators Boxer and Menendez meeting with ANCA chairman Mourad Topalian, a typical Armenian terrorist who was charged and spent some good time in the US prisons? Personally, I feel ashamed being represented by the two senators, who put hold on Mr. Bryza's nomination just to please Armenian lobby before the elections.
What does Georgia have to do with Armenian lobby?
Mr. LeVine's blog entry doesn't really add anything relevant to this discussion. More importantly, it leaves aside the very obvious role and clear interference from the Armenian lobby (ANCA is an Armenian lobby, hires and pays lobbyists), while adding a third-party, Georgia, to the mix. Mr. Bryza was nominated by President Obama to serve as Ambassador to Azerbaijan, not Georgia. So it's not relevant.
What is relevant, though, is how ANCA, an organization whose chairman, Mourad Topalian, spent time in a federal prison on terrorism charges, is allowed to meddle into national interests and foreign policy of the United States. And now he is visiting Congress along with the rest of ANCA delegation, including offices of chairman Con. Howard Berman and Sen. Barbara Boxer.
Meanwhile, actions by the former minister Georgy Khaindrava (who was dismissed in 2006) were just hooliganism, that should hardly play any role in the decision, and is tantamount to give any serious weight to tomatoes routinely thrown at politicians, or a shoe at President Bush in Iraq. This is very "National Enquirer"-like to even report such yellow stuff in the Foreign Policy magazine.
All countries have lobbies in DC, some actually care for the interests of the US and the country they lobby for, others, i.e. aipac, do not!
ANCA, and in this case Sen. Boxer and Sen. Menendez put Armenia's interests over interests of the United States.
Please, stop posting your nonesense here. It highly likely you are an azeri/turk pov pusher.
In addition to all the other concerns that have been raised about Mr. Bryza's nomination, an important element is being overlooked. Mr. Bryza did not disclose relevant information during his confirmation hearing, which was important for Senators to consider before voting on his nomination.
Mr. Bryza's spouse, Zeyno Baran, serves in a professional capacity for an Azerbaijani government institution. Ms. Baran, is on the editorial board of an Azerbaijani government journal, Azerbaijani Focus, which was created through a decree by the Azerbaijani President. http://sam.gov.az/en/journals/azerbaijan-focus/editorial-board
Mr. Bryza did not reveal this information at his nomination hearing.
The Azerbaijani Foreign Minister was one of only three men to serve in his wedding party, along with school friends. http://www.zaman.com.tr/haber.do?haberno=579663 This at a time, he was supposed to be mediating a deadly conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia through frequent conversations with this Azerbaijani Foreign Minister. The Azerbaijani Foreign Minister has threatened to renew military aggression in the region against U.S. interests.
Mr. Bryza did not reveal this information at his nomination hearing.
In his testimony before the Senate, Mr. Bryza said that he and his wife, who directs a project that received money from Azerbaijani businesses, separated their professional and personal lives 10 years ago. There are, however, numerous examples within the past ten years of Mr. Bryza and Ms. Baran presenting together at conferences, including conferences that were funded by either Azerbaijani businesses or energy corporations with an interest in Azerbaijan. http://asbarez.com/83834/are-bryza%E2%80%99s-professional-and-private-lives-really-separate/
Do you think the 17 Senators are not as smart as you, to question, or to consider the need to question heritage/career of Mr. Bryza's wife? If you think, Mr. Bryza should not be the US Ambassador, because his wife is Turkish, then why Sen. Menendez wrote a quick response letter to the Washington Post, saying that his decision to put a hold on Bryza's apoointment has nothing to do with his wife? Think harder.
It is not about how smart or stupid the senators are, it is about who's interests they are serving. America's or not. Too often they forget they are elected to represent the people not the corporations.
(9)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE